Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 F.2d 53 - Petteway v. United States

Petteway v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

261 F.2d 53 · 1958

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
6
states following
September 1989
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently September 1989 · most notably Davis v. United States (1964), United States v. Barone (1964)

41 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions

3901958196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Lee · Safarik v. United States · Smith v. United States · 68 F. Supp. 464 - Mueller v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well established that it is not a search to observe what is open and patent either in daylight or in artificial light.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.