Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 F.3d 120 - Trevor Neverson v. Lynn Bissonnette

Trevor Neverson v. Lynn Bissonnette’s Empirical Analysis

261 F.3d 120 · 2001

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably Charles Delaney III v. James Matesanz et al. (2001), Derman v. United States (2002)

34 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

500200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Duncan v. Walker · Negron v. United States · Zadvydas v. Davis · Felker v. Turpin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he time during which a properly filed application for state post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this section.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “in our post-AEDPA world there is no reason why a district court should not retain jurisdiction over a meritorious claim and stay further proceedings pending the complete exhaustion of state remedies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the date on which the [state-court] judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.