American Silicon Technologies v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
261 F.3d 1371 · 2001
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably Nippon Steel Corporation Nkk v. United States Usa Isg (2006), Pesquera Mares Australes Ltda. v. United States (2001)
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Mead Corp. · Colby v. Jc Penney Company Inc · SKF USA Inc. v. United States · Fujitsu General Limited v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]ven if it is possible to draw two inconsistent conclusions from evidence in the record.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[c]osts shall normally be calculated based on the records of the exporter or producer of the merchandise.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonably reflect the costs associated with the production and sale of the merchandise.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.