Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 F.3d 707 - United States v. Quilling

United States v. Quilling’s Empirical Analysis

261 F.3d 707 · 2001

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

23 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Negron v. United States · United States v. Garrett · United States v. Pulido · United States of America v. Clarence Richardson Jr · United States v. Boykin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If it appears that a defendant or the government is prejudiced by a joinder of offenses or of defendants in an indictment or information or by such joinder for trial together, the court may order an election or separate trials of counts, grant a severance of defendants or provide whatever other relief justice requires. In ruling on a motion by a defendant for severance the court may order the attorney for the government to deliver to the court for inspection in camera any statements or confessions made by the defendants which the government intends to introduce in evidence at the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “of the same or similar character, or are based on the same act or transaction, or are connected with or constitute parts of a common scheme or plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “prejudice requiring severance is not shown if evidence on the severed counts would be admissible in the trial of the remaining counts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.