Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 FSUPP3D 430 - In re Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation

In re Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 5303 · 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 12 (§ 1 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 62 · 15 U.S.C. § 78o-10 · 47 U.S.C. § 152 · 7 U.S.C. § 2 · 7 U.S.C. § 6s

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · United States v. Lopez · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Brunswick Corporation v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Dealers did provide 'some limited liquidity to [t]rueEX's non-anonymous dealer-to-client RFQ platform,' but ensured that this platform did not 'reach critical trading mass' ..., [which] conduct successfully neutralized [t]rueEX 'from bringing an all-to-all platform to market and becoming a competitive threat'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An inference of conspiracy will not arise when the conspirators' parallel conduct 'made perfect business sense,' ... 'there are obvious alternative explanations for the facts alleged,' ... or the alleged facts 'suggest competition at least as plausibly as [they] suggest anticompetitive conspiracy[.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the requirement of ' plausible grounds to infer an agreement does not impose a probability requirement at the pleading stage ; it simply calls for enough facts to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of illegal agreement[.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.