Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 Ga. 298 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2022

10 state decisions

501991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shapiro v. Lipman · Dennis v. Grimes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “OCGA § 17-7-170 governs demands for speedy trial in non-capital cases and such statute and the case law dealing with such statute must be distinguished from OCGA § 17-7-171 [which governs demands for speedy trial in capital cases] and the case law dealing with that statute as the two are quite different. The requirements of OCGA § 17-7-171 are also more stringent than those of OCGA § 17-7-170 due to the different nature of the two types of offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[c]ompliance with the third prong is mandatory and must be accomplished regardless of whether the case appears on a trial calendar during either of the first two regular terms following the term at which the demand was filed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[C]ompliance with the third prong may be accomplished either by the defendant himself or by his counsel. Dennis v. Grimes, 216 Ga. 671 ( 118 SE2d 923 ) (1961).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.