Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 Ga. App. 633 - Johnson v. State

261 Ga. App. 633 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2021

8 state decisions

50200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. State · 260 Ga. App. 661 - Baird v. State · 200 Ga. App. 666 - Jones v. State · Johnson v. Riverdale Anesthesia Associates · 258 Ga. App. 411 - Kitchens v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Flowers (reading):] “If you submit to testing and the results indicate an alcohol concentration of 0.08 grams or more, your Georgia driver’s license or privilege to drive on the highways of this state may be suspended for a minimum period of one year. After first submitting to the required state tests, you are entitled to additional chemical tests of your blood, breath, urine, or other bodily substances at your own expense and from qualified personnel of your own choosing. Will you submit to the state administered chemical tests of your breath under the implied consent law?” [Gillaspy:] I will do a blood test. [Flowers:] You want a blood test? Well, let me re-read it to you. ‘Will you submit to the state administered chemical tests of your blood under the implied consent law?” [Gillaspy:] Yes, sir.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.