Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 Ga. App. 871 - Smith v. State

261 Ga. App. 871 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Gibbons v. State · Smith v. State · Waldrip v. State · Whatley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]ecisions as to whether to interpose certain objections fall within the realm of trial tactics and strategy and usually provide no basis for reversal of a conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To establish ineffectiveness, a defendant must prove that trial counsel’s performance was deficient and but for the deficiency a reasonable probability existed that the result of the trial would have been different. An error by counsel, even if professionally unreasonable, does not warrant reversal of a criminal conviction if it had no effect on the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The recalling of a witness for further examination at the instance of either party is always within the discretion of the trial judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.