261 Ill. App. 3d 191 - People v. Stack’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · 54 Ill. 2d 280 - People v. Pickett · 112 Ill. 2d 111 - People v. Morgan · 99 Ill. 2d 499 - People v. Berry · 91 Ill. 2d 178 - People v. Pastorino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(i) If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with an applicable discovery rule or an order issued pursuant thereto, the court may order such party to permit the discovery of material and information not previously disclosed, grant a continuance, exclude such evidence, or enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances. (ii) Wilful violation by counsel of an applicable discovery rule or an order issued pursuant thereto may subject counsel to appropriate sanctions by the court." 134 Ill.2d R. 415(g).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.