Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 Ill. App. 3d 821 - SAKONYL v. Lindsey

261 Ill. App. 3d 821 - SAKONYL v. Lindsey’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2024

3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

1201994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 63 Ill. 2d 48 - Lewis v. Dunne · 102 Ill. App. 3d 454 - Schumann v. Kumarich · 130 Ill. App. 3d 900 - Shipley v. Stephenson County Electoral Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is assumed by [the circulator’s] sworn statement that the circulator is subjecting herself to possible perjury prosecution. Thus, the circulator’s affidavit requirement is considered a meaningful and realistic method of eliminating fraudulent signatures and protecting the integrity of the political process.” Sakonyi, 261 Ill. App. 3d at 826 , 634 N.E.2d at 447 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “testimony assuring the integrity of [the circulator's] oath.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.