Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

261 Kan. 175

931 P.2d 664

In Re Brown

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1996

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1996-12-10

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-12-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably State v. Moncla (1997), State v. Hebert (2004)

1 district · 49 state decisions

2701996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 In a letter dated November 21, 1996, to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Gregory S. Brown, of Kansas City, Kansas, an attorney admitted to practice law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (1996 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 223).

¶2 At the time respondent surrendered his license, a self-reported complaint was to be scheduled for hearing before a panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys. Respondent reported that he had billed clients for time and expenses which had not been incurred and that he had submitted false travel and meal expenses to his law firm.

¶3 This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of respondent’s license should be accepted and that respondent should be disbarred.

¶4 It Is Therefore Ordered that Gregory S. Brown be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas, and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

¶5 It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Gregory S. Brown from the rofl of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

¶6 It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to respondent, and that respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (1996 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 226).

/261/kan/175 · .json · Public domain