In re Zivanovic’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably GT, Kansas, L.L.C. v. Riley County Register of Deeds (2001), 25 Kan. App. 2d 245 - State v. Patterson (1998)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hall · Boatright v. Kansas Racing Commission · State, Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. Public Employee Relations Board of the Kansas Department of Human Resources · Amoco Production Co. v. Armold, Director of Taxation · Misco Industries, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘The ruling of an administrative agency on questions of law, while not as conclusive as its findings of facts, is nonetheless persuasive and may carry with it a strong presumption of correctness. . . .’ “ ‘Usually, interpretation of a statute by an administrative agency charged with the responsibility of enforcing that statute is entitled to great judicial deference. [Citation omitted.] The agency’s interpretation of a challenged statute may, in fact, be entitled to controlling significance injudicial proceedings. Further, if there is a rational basis for the agency’s interpretation, it should be upheld on judicial review.’ [Citations omitted.]” 261 Kan. at 193 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““(d) No registration fee whatsoever shall be paid, collected or required for or on: ... . (3) any mortgage or other instrument upon that portion of the consideration stated in the mortgage tendered for filing which is verified by affidavit to be principal indebtedness covered or included in a previously recorded mortgage or other instrument with the same lender or their assigns upon which the registration fee herein provided for has been paid.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Highly summarized, the Zivanovics borrowed money from the First State Bank and gave a mortgage. The First State Bank paid the mortgage registration tax and assigned the note to a second financial institution, which assigned the mortgage to a third financial institution. Both assignments were recorded. “The Zivanovics then refinanced the note and mortgage with the original lender, the First State Bank, and Riley County collected a mortgage registration fee.” 261 Kan. at 192.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.