State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably State v. Kunellis (2003), State v. Gholston (2001)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Abel · Mullins Coal Co. v. Director · Dawson v. Delaware · Martin v. Delaware · State v. Grissom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Dawson does not stand for the position that such evidence must always be excluded. In fact, United States v. Abel [citation omitted] held that evidence of gang membership was probative of witness bias, and its probative value outweighed the potential for prejudice. Dawson does not overrule or limit Abel ; we read Dawson as applying to the sentencing fact scenario.’ ” State v. Roberts, 261 Kan. 320, 325 , 931 P.2d 683 (1997) (quoting State v. Tran, 252 Kan. 494, 503-04 , 847 P.2d 680 [1993]).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Leitner“`Errors that do not affirmatively cause prejudice to the substantial rights of a complaining party do not require reversal when substantial justice has been done.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Goodson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.