Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 Kan. 865 - State v. Robinson

State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
3
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

4 district · 102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Orr (1997), State v. Lewis (1998)

4 district · 102 state decisions

5001997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Michigan v. Mosley · Martin Theatres of Texas, Inc. v. Bullock · Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Ass'n v. Austin Products Co. · Todd v. Kelly · State v. Timley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'purpose or knowledge is treated as depraved heart second-degree murder, and less extreme recklessness is punished as manslaughter.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Based on Miranda and [Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S. Ct. 321 , 46 L. Ed. 2d 313 (1975)], if a defendant invokes his or her right to remain silent, the interrogation must stop immediately and the right must be scrupulously honored. This does not mean an interrogation resumed at a later time is invalidated if the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to be silent at this later time and the defendant's right to be silent was scrupulously honored while it was invoked.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The defendant is charged with the crime of murder in the second degree. The defendant pleads not guilty. “To establish this charge, each of the following claims must be proved: “1. That the defendant intentionally killed Paul G. Madden; and “2. That it was not done upon an unreasonable but honest belief that circumstances existed that justified deadly force in defense of a person; and “3. That this act occurred on or about the 27th [day of] February, 1997, in Sedgwick County, Kansas.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.