Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 Ky. 607 - Arnett v. Commonwealth

Arnett v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2019

6 state decisions

20193519401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sowder v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... witnesses should not be permitted to express their opinions or conclusions ... but should confine their evidence to such facts as when, where, and how often they had seen [the purchaser] drunk.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.