Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 La. 153 - State v. Nelson

State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
3
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably State v. Wilkerson (1981), 315 So. 2d 727 - State v. Monk (1975)

58 state decisions

44019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bumper v. North Carolina · State v. Johnson · State v. Andrus · State v. Wright · State v. Coleman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`Before the admission of demonstrative evidence at a trial, such evidence must be identified. The testimony can be visual, that is, by testimony at the trial that the object displayed is the one related to the case. For admission, it suffices if the evidence establishes that it is more probable than not that the object is connected with the case. A preponderance of the evidence is sufficient.'"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"* * * The transcript of the testimony of any other witness who testified at the preliminary examination is admissible for any purpose in any subsequent proceeding in the case, on behalf of either party, if the court finds that the witness is dead, too ill to testify, absent from the state, or cannot be found, and that the absence of the witness was not procured by the party offering the testimony. * * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"The lack of positive identification goes to the weight of the evidence, rather than to its admissibility. Ultimately, connexity of physical evidence is a factual matter for determination by the jury."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.