Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

261 Mich. 552

Heath v. Gloster

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1932-09-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1974

1 state decisions

Relies on Dirr v. Hitchman · Heath v. Gloster

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-09-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Petition eor Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

¶2The petition for rehearing in the case of Heath v. Gloster, 260 Mich. 85, a law action, is denied. Dirr v. Hitchman, 260 Mich. 179, is an equity suit involving the equitable claims of the respective parties. These we cannot consider on appeal in a law action where there has been a notice of forfeiture of an executory land contract, followed, after fair trial, by valid judgment for restitution duly entered both by the circuit court commissioner, and, on appeal, by the circuit court.

/261/mich/552 · .json · Public domain