Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 Minn. 1 - Eisel v. Eisel

Eisel v. Eisel’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Wallin v. Wallin (1971), Hansen v. Hansen (1969)

26 state decisions

170196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spratt v. Spratt · Sherman v. Bureau of Catholic Charities · Molto v. Molto · Atwood v. Atwood · Aske v. Aske

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “From the very beginning of the administration of justice by the courts of our country, even under the common law rules which have been relaxed by statutes, the custody of very young children has been awarded to the mother, even in some instances where it has been proved that she was not morally upon a very high plane, on the broad ground that the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration; and for children from three to six years of age, as here involved, it is unquestionably for the child's welfare that it remain with the mother.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In determining the question of custody, the trial courts are vested with broad discretion, and appeal courts are reluctant to interfere with their determination. We have not had an opportunity to observe and hear the testimony of the parties and their witnesses. Nevertheless, we are obliged to scrutinize the record and determine whether the trial court was justified in arriving at the decision he reached, resolving all questions of fact in favor of the prevailing party as we must.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.