Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 Mont. 379 - State v. Barker

State v. Barker’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Strunk v. United States · State v. Curtis · State v. Hembd · State ex rel. Briceno v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Yellowstone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the State was unable to demonstrate either compelling circumstances to warrant such a lengthy delay, or that it diligently pursued bringing Barker's case to trial, we conclude that, in this instance, the delay weighs heavily against the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the prevention of oppressive pretrial incarceration; (2) the minimization of the defendant’s anxiety and concern; and (3) the limitation of impairment of the defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) the length of the delay; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the assertion of the right by the defendant; and (4) the prejudice to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.