State v. Barker’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Strunk v. United States · State v. Curtis · State v. Hembd · State ex rel. Briceno v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Yellowstone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the State was unable to demonstrate either compelling circumstances to warrant such a lengthy delay, or that it diligently pursued bringing Barker's case to trial, we conclude that, in this instance, the delay weighs heavily against the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ariegwe“(1) the prevention of oppressive pretrial incarceration; (2) the minimization of the defendant’s anxiety and concern; and (3) the limitation of impairment of the defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Atkins“(1) the length of the delay; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the assertion of the right by the defendant; and (4) the prejudice to the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Atkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.