Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 N.C. 565 - In Re Scarborough

In Re Scarborough’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2013

6 state decisions

40196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chicago Ry Co v. Schendel Same · Shaw v. Lee · Darrah v. Foster · Lund v. City of Seattle · Howle v. Twin States Express, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The asset (right of action for wrongful death) has a situs in the county in which personal service can be had on the tort-feasor. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.