¶1concurring.
¶2For the reasons stated in my concurrence in State v. Howell, 254 Neb. 247, 575 N.W.2d 861 (1998), I concur in the judgment of the court.
261 Neb. 690
625 N.W.2d 511
Decided April 26, 2001
Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 2001-04-26
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably State v. Marshall (2005), State v. Gartner (2002)
4 district · 24 state decisions
Relies on State v. Howell
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-04-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1concurring.
¶2For the reasons stated in my concurrence in State v. Howell, 254 Neb. 247, 575 N.W.2d 861 (1998), I concur in the judgment of the court.