Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 N.J. Super. 110 - Dunphy v. Gregor

261 N.J. Super. 110 - Dunphy v. Gregor’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2018

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

120199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas · Dillon v. Legg · Portee v. Jaffee · 46 Cal. 3d 267 - Elden v. Sheldon · Caputzal v. Lindsay Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is clear that the meaning of “intimate familial relationship” for the purposes of eligibility to sue in tort must be based upon the qualities and characteristics of the particular relationship and not upon a mechanistic formula in a definition. [Id. at 122, 617 A.2d 1248 .]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether the plaintiff and the injured person were members of the same household, their emotional reliance on each other, the particulars of their day to day relationship, and the manner in which they related to each other in attending to life's mundane requirements.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The definition of "relative," a term corresponding to "familial," has been dealt with by the Appellate Division in cases involving automobile insurance. In applying statutory language, interpreting the terms of contracts of insurance, and divining the expectations of parties to those contracts, different panels have reached a variety of results in dealing with the technical intricacies of personal injury protection and uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage. These cases, which are based on principles of contract construction, are not useful in developing an understanding of the policies that inform the standards governing tort law. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.