¶1 Order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Rosenberg v. Salomon (144 N. Y. 92). Question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.
¶2 Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ.
261 N.Y. 573
185 N.E 743
Decided February 28, 1933
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1933-02-28
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1942
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relies on Rosenberg v. . Salomon
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1933-02-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Rosenberg v. Salomon (144 N. Y. 92). Question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.
¶2 Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ.