Neumann v. Liles’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
2 district · 6 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"First, the court must determine whether the defendant has met its initial burden to show that the claim against which the motion is made 'arises out of' one or more protected activities described in subsection (2). Second, if the defendant meets its burden, 'the burden shifts to the plaintiff in the action to establish that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim by presenting substantial evidence to support a prima facie case.' If the plaintiff succeeds in meeting that burden, the special motion to strike must be denied. ORS 31.150(3)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“against any claim in a civil action that arises out of * * * [a]ny * * * conduct in furtherance of * * * the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(d) Any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.