Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 Pa. Super. 204 - Commonwealth v. Davis

261 Pa. Super. 204 - Commonwealth v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 1985
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Commonwealth v. Shelton · Commonwealth v. Mitchell · Commonwealth v. Coleman · 250 Pa. Super. 66 - Commonwealth v. Kovacs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the defendant] must either file a motion under Rule 1100(f) or contest the Commonwealth’s petition to extend, so that by one method or the other the facts and issues come before the court. Otherwise, his Rule 1100 claim will be waived. See Commonwealth v. Coleman, 477 Pa. 400 , 383 A.2d 1268 (1978); Commonwealth v. Wallace, 475 Pa. 27 , 379 A.2d 558 (1977).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.