Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 Pa. Super. 296 - Commonwealth v. Garcia

261 Pa. Super. 296 - Commonwealth v. Garcia’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 1991
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Commonwealth v. Garvin · 1 Cal. 3d 836 - Price v. Superior Court · Commonwealth v. Carter · Commonwealth v. Pritchett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We believe that no fixed rule with respect to disclosure is justifiable. The problem is one that calls for balancing the public interest in protecting the flow of information against the individual’s right to prepare his defense. Whether a proper balance renders nondisclosure erroneous must depend on the particular circumstances of each case, taking into consideration the crime charged, the possible defenses, the possible significance of the informer’s testimony, and other relevant factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.