261 Pa. Super. 355 - Commonwealth v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Clair · 223 Pa. Super. 60 - Commonwealth v. Lockhart · Commonwealth v. Cohen · 256 Pa. Super. 63 - Commonwealth v. Crocker · 238 Pa. Super. 161 - Commonwealth v. Duffy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A person may not be convicted of more than one offense defined by this chapter for conduct designed to commit or to culminate in the commission of the same crime.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““(f) At any time before trial, the defendant or his attorney may apply to the court for an order dismissing the charges with prejudice on the ground that this Rule has been violated. A copy of such application shall be served upon the attorney for the Commonwealth, who shall also have the right to be heard thereon. Any order granting such application shall dismiss the charges with prejudice and discharge the defendant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.