Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 S.C. 308 - Gore v. Leeke

Gore v. Leeke’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2018

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

10019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leary v. United States · Opper v. United States · Tot v. United States · United States v. Romano · State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The weight of authority, in other jurisdictions where the question has arisen, appears to be to the effect that both the nature of the felony itself and the circumstances of its commission are to be considered in determining whether a felony is foreseeably dangerous so as to properly invoke the application of the felony-murder rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whether or not the felony-murder rule should, or should not, be applied as to every homicide committed in connection with the commission of any and every felony whether or not inherently or foreseeably dangerous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]here is no room for the logical application of [the felony murder rule] where the felony committed was not an inherently dangerous one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.