¶1The trial judge suppressed a statement taken from Brown in the Hillsborough County jail, on the ground that Brown was at the time represented by the Public Defender, who was not notified of the interrogation. Full Miranda warnings were given. Williams v. State, Fla.App.2d 1966, 188 So.2d 320, would support the trial judge’s ruling, but since that decision the Supreme Court has allowed a confession taken from a defendant represented by counsel who was in fact waiting in the lobby of the jail to see his client at the conclusion of the interrogation. State v. Craig, Fla.1970, 237 So.2d 737. We must therefore reverse and remand for reconsideration in the light of Craig.
261 So. 2d 186
State v. Brown
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 28, 1972
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1972-04-28
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1979
1 state decisions
Relies on 188 So. 2d 320 - Williams v. State · 237 So. 2d 737 - State v. Craig
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1972-04-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →