Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

261 So. 2d 200

Alvarez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1972-04-25

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1975

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-04-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellants-co-defendants were found guilty of the crimes of breaking and entering a dwelling and grand larceny, by a jury in the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County. They were sentenced to terms of twenty years on the breaking and entering count and five years on the grand larceny count, the sentences to run concurrently.

¶2By these appeals the defendants are urging reversal on the grounds that the court erred in denying them a speedy trial; in refusing to grant the motion for severance and in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence.

¶3We have carefully considered these points in the light of the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. Therefore, the judgment and sentences appealed are affirmed.

¶4Affirmed.

/261/so2d/200 · .json · Public domain