Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

261 So. 2d 204

Keusch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1972-03-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1972

1 state decisions

Relies on Carter v. State · Ortega v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant was convicted by verdict of a jury of buying, receiving or aiding in the concealment of stolen property (34,000 pounds of beef). Upon consideration of the contentions presented on appeal by the defendant, in the light of the record, briefs and arguments, we find no reversible error has been shown. The refusal to suppress evidence obtained upon the search was proper, based on evidence submitted at the hearing thereon. Carter *205v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 324, 334; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 177. Appellant’s contention of insufficiency of the evidence is found to be without merit.

¶2The judgment is affirmed.

/261/so2d/204 · .json · Public domain