Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

261 So. 3d 744

King v. State

Decided December 21, 2018

Relies on Burnett v. Clarendon Select Insurance

Decided 2018-12-21

PER CURIAM.

¶1The motion for postconviction relief under review is not contained within the record and cannot be located by the lower court, the lower court clerk or the State. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded with directions that Appellant be permitted to re-file an amended motion within thirty days after the mandate issues, upon which the trial court shall render a ruling. SeePeraza v. State , 920 So.2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

¶2REVERSED AND REMANDED.

¶3ORFINGER, TORPY and BERGER, JJ., concur.

/261/so3d/744 · .json · Public domain