House v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 208th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on In the Interest of J.F.C. · State v. Addington · Herbert v. Herbert · In the Interest of H.R.M. · T.G. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the person is infected with a communicable ■ disease that presents a . threat to the public health and, if the application is for inpatient treatment, has failed to follow the orders • of the health authority.or department; (2) as a result of that communicable disease the person: (A) is likely to cause serious harm to himself; or (B) will, if not examined, observed, isolated, or treated, continue to endanger public health; and (3) the person’s condition is expected .to continue for more than 90 days..”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.