Tijerina v. Walters’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Paul v. Davis · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Burnett v. New York Central Railroad · Batson v. Kentucky · Perry v. Block
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which [the information] was collected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tijerina v. Walters“each routine use [for a given system of records], including the categories of users and the purpose of such use.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tijerina v. Walters“is viewed as only somewhat greater than gross negligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Tijerina v. Walters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.