Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 ALA 417 - Smith v. Chism

Smith v. Chism’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2017

8 state decisions

201955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woodruff v. Hundley · Griffin v. Milligan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Smith concedes the validity of the will, admits that it should have been probated, and as shown above filed a petition to attain that end, which was before the probate court at the time the decree appealed from was rendered.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * Unlike the situation presented in the case of Griffin v. Milligan, 177 Ala. 57 , 58 So. 257 , there are adversary parties to the instant appeal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.