Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Ark. 288 - Sims v. State

Sims v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
6
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 111 Ill. 2d 87 - People v. Coleman (1986), 337 Pa. Super. 174 - Commonwealth v. Grady (1984)

27 state decisions

15019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. Medberry · State Ex Rel. Van Natta v. Rising · Oliver v. United States · Simmons v. State · Dolphus v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All of the authorities relied .upon by [Sims] do, indeed hold that a law which makes a crime punishable in a manner in which it was not punishable at the time it was committed is an invalid ex post facto law. But these cases have no application here, because the offense with which [Sims] was charged was committed after the adoption of Act 931 of 1975. The enhanced penalty provided for a third offense by that act is not for the first or second offense, but is for the third offense, which is considered as ag-gravkted by reason of the preceding offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “habitual criminal and habitual traffic offenders acts are not ex post facto laws, in circumstances such as those here presented, since they give notice that if persons persist in certain behavior they will be punished more severely than previously.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.