Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

262 Ark. 439

Ervin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 21, 1977

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1977-11-21

Relies on Adams, Nelson, and Timanus v. State · Gross v. State · 64 Okla. Crim. 396 - Huckleberry v. Estate

Decided 1977-11-21

George Rose Smith, Justice.

¶1On November 2, 1976, the appellant shot and killed Willie E. Briggs, in the course of an argument, as the two were sitting in a car at a parking lot in Little Rock. The appellant testified that he shot because he thought Briggs was about to draw a gun. Charged with second degree murder, the appellant was found guilty and given a 20-year sentence.

¶2The court instructed the jury, in the language of the Criminal Code, that a person may not use deadly physical force in self-defense if he knows that he can avoid the necessity of using that force with complete safety by retreating. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-507 (Crim. Code 1976). The appellant argues that the court should have added the statutory exceptions: That one is not required to retreat if he is in his dwelling and was not the original aggressor, or is a law enforcement officer, or is assisting at the direction of such an officer. Id. The exceptions were not pertinent to the facts in the case; so there was no need for the court to include them in the charge to the jury. Gross v. State, 186 Ind. 581, 117 N.E. 562, 1 A.L.R. 1151 (1917); Adams v. State, 200 Md. 133, 88 A. 2d 556 (1952); Huckleberry v. State, 64 Okl. Cr. 396, 81 P. 2d 493 (1938).

¶3Affirmed.

We agree. Harris, C.J., and Fogleman and Holt, JJ.
/262/ark/439 · .json · Public domain