Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Ark. 513 - Pearson v. State

Pearson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2002 · most notably 51 Cal. 3d 437 - People v. Rodriguez (1990), Bangs v. State (1992)

32 state decisions

1601977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... A court may revoke the probation, enter a judgment of conviction, and impose any sentence that may have been imposed originally for the offense ‘if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has inexcusably failed to comply with a condition of his suspension or probation.’ . . . (Emphasis added.) See also: Ark. Crim. Code § 41-1208(4) and (6) (1977 Repl.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.