Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

262 Conn. 392

State v. Edelman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 18, 2003

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2003-02-18

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2010

8 state decisions

Relies on State v. Edelman · State v. Edelman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-02-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶2The defendant, Steven Edelman, appeals, following our grant of certification to appeal, from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the trial court’s judgment of conviction of violating the state building code, as prohibited by General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 29-263,1 and remanding the case for a new trial. State v. Edelman, 64 Conn. App. 480, 780 A.2d 980*393(2001). We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Under the plain error doctrine, should the defendant’s conviction be reversed and judgment directed in his favor, on the ground that there was no evidence that the defendant unlawfully continued to work under § 118.2 of the state building code?” State v. Edelman, 258 Conn. 940, 786 A.2d 427 (2001).

¶3After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

¶4The appeal is dismissed.

¶5 General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 29-263 provides in relevant part: “Except as provided in subsection (h) of section 29-252a, after October 1, 1970, no building or structure shall be constructed or altered until an application has been filed with the building official and a permit issued. . . .”

/262/conn/392 · .json · Public domain