King v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
262 F. 56 · 1920
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1987
7 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bronson v. Schulten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the intervention shall be in subordination to, and in recognition of, the propriety of the main proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“be in subordination to, and in recognition of, the propriety of the main proceeding,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.