Walter v. Atha’s Empirical Analysis
262 F. 75 · 1919
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 1988
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Schwartz · Whitney v. Wyman · Ohio Valley Bank Co. v. Mack · Estes v. Gunter · Baumhauer v. Austin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A finding of fact by a Referee, based on conflicting evidence and involving questions of credibility” should not be disturbed “unless there is cogent evidence of mistake.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.