Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 F.2d 183 - Ezee Stone Cutter Manufacturing Company, a Corporation, and Bo Gann and James Willis v. Southwest Industrial Products, Inc., Southwest Industrial Products, Inc. v. Ezee Stone Cutter Manufacturing Company, a Corporation

Ezee Stone Cutter Manufacturing Company, a Corporation, and Bo Gann and James Willis v. Southwest Industrial Products, Inc., Southwest Industrial Products, Inc. v. Ezee Stone Cutter Manufacturing Company, a Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

262 F.2d 183 · 1959

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
October 1975
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 1975

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

140195919601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Expanded Metal Co. v. Bradford · Leeds Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company · Cleo Syrup Corp. v. Coca-Cola Co. · Pointer v. Six Wheel Corp. · Aetna Life Insurance v. Barnett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The issuance of a patent is prima facie evidence of both novelty and utility (see 35 U.S.C.A. § 282 ), and when one attacks a patent he must make good his attack with reasonable clearness. He has the burden of proof, and every reasonable doubt will be resolved against him. Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal Corporation, 8 Cir., 1933, 64 F.2d 217, 221 , and cases cited; G. H. Packwood Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis Janitor Supply Co., 8 Cir., 1941, 115 F.2d 958, 964-965 . “ ‘In a ease where the patentability of a claimed invention is in issue, evidence of commercial success is admissible and may be forthcoming. In a doubtful case, such evidence may turn the scale in favor of the plaintiff. See Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal Corporation, supra, at page 221 of 64 F.2d, and cases cited. “ ‘In such a case, evidence that the patent device or combination solved a long-felt want and an old problem which had baffled those skilled in the art is also admissible. [Citing cases]”’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.