Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 F.2d 44 - Jones v. United States

Jones v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

262 F.2d 44 · 1958

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 1977
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 1977

15 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

130195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Commonwealth v. Holden · 95 Ga. App. 513 - Carr v. State · Davis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if a fact, standing alone, does not conclusively demonstrate guilt, a defendant is not entitled to have it filtered out of the evidence. An effort to blinker out all circumstantial color and tone would result only in distortion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.