Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

262 F.2d 456

Docket No. 14604.

Marshall v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 10, 1958.

Decided Nov. 20, 1958.

Certiorari Denied March 23, 1959.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1958-11-20

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1958-11-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 1979

16 federal appellate ·

60195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1See 79 S.Ct. 735.

¶2Mr. Jerrold Scoutt, Jr., Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), for appellant.

¶3Mr. Edgar T. Bellinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Mr. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for ap-pellee.

¶4Before Prettyman, Chief Judge, and Edgerton and Danaher, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6This is an appeal from a denial of a motion filed in the District Court under Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code. Appellant says his trial counsel failed to call a certain person as a witness and that his attorney, after the verdict, argued on behalf of both appellant and a co-defendant, also convicted, in respect to the sentence to be imposed. Despite the earnest and skillful presentation of appellant’s points by counsel appointed to represent him on appeal, we find no error.

¶7Affirmed.

/262/f2d/456 · .json · Public domain