Rosof v. Roth’s Empirical Analysis
262 F.2d 829 · 1959
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1977
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 108 · 11 U.S.C. § 110
Relies on Pepper v. Litton · Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du Bois · Studley v. Boylston National Bank · Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co. · National Bank of Newport v. National Herkimer County Bank of Little Falls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Every conveyance made and every obligation incurred with actual intent, as distinguished from intent presumed in law, to hinder, delay, or defraud either present or future creditors, is fraudulent as to both present and future creditors.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.