Shoreline Enterprises of America, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
262 F.2d 933 · 1959
Citation profile
88 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently March 1999 · most notably Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board (1970), National Labor Relations Board v. Bata Shoe Co. (1967)
88 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Brooks v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co. · Matter of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Harry a Groban and Nathan Groban · National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Mfg Co · National Labor Relations Board v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Louisville, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Eligibility to vote depends on whether an employee is sufficiently concerned with the terms and conditions of employment in a unit to warrant his participation in the selection of a collective bargaining agent.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The National Labor Relations Board is not just an umpire to referee a game between an employer and a union. It is also a guardian of individual employees.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Stipulation for Certification upon Consent Election”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.