Sm v. Jk’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · Smith v. Barry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will not hear a challenge to a district court decision if a notice of cross-appeal is not filed.” S.M. v. J.K., 262 F.3d 914, 923 (9th Cir.2001), amended by 315 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir.2003). The issues are not sufficiently interrelated,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chavez v. Ciolino“A court may admit somewhat questionable testimony if it falls within the range where experts might reasonably differ, and where the jury must decide among the conflicting views.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.