In re Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1995
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Hamrick · Fierman v. Frankfort Broom Co. · In re Meadville Pennsylvania Distilling Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court fails to see any merit in the bankrupt’s contention that the additional acts of bankruptcy set forth in the amendment could only be raised by the filing of a Creditors’ Petition in an entirely new bankruptcy proceeding. If the bankrupt has any defenses ..., he can raise them as well in the existing bankruptcy proceeding as he could have in any bankruptcy proceeding that the creditors would have been compelled to file if the Referee had not permitted the filing of the amendment_ If he has no defense, then it would actually have been a waste of the bankrupt’s assets for the Referee to have denied the amendment and thereby put the creditors to the expense of instuting an entirely new bankruptcy proceeding....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Crabtree
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.