← 262 F. Supp. 2d 1053 - Bartlett v. Duncan

262 F. Supp. 2d 1053 - Bartlett v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

cited by 3 later decisions

May 2004

most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Teague v. Lane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“was given actual notice of his life-long duty to register.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
e.g. Bartlett v. Es Alameida Wa
“repeated actual notice of the registration requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Bartlett v. Es Alameida Wa
“[a]ctual knowledge is not an element of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Bartlett v. Es Alameida Wa

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.