Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Ga. 136 - Goldstein v. Goldstein

Goldstein v. Goldstein’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
7
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2018

20 state decisions

100199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stokes v. Stokes · Courtney v. Courtney · Thomas v. Thomas · Meeks v. Kirkland · White v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““it is impossible to know in advance whether any specific contingent fee case will ultimately yield a fee — or, if it does, how much the fee will be. It is also nearly impossible to gauge how much work and expense will be required after the date of the divorce to become entitled to collect a contingent fee. These qualities of contingent fee agreements make them too remote, speculative and uncertain to be considered marital assets in maHng an equitable division of property.” 414 S.E.2d at 476 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Second, the marital property must be divided, not necessarily equally, but equitably. The first step is a question of law; the second step is a matter held in the trial court's discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “acquired as a direct result of the labor and investments of the parties during the marriage[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.